Why I bang on about wanting the full range of pigments described.

Scientists, statisticians may understand, from this talk, that it’s not just an art-history thing. Note that when Prof. Beeby speaks of ‘indigo’ he means indigotin, the substance, not the plant we call ‘indigo’.

The implication, in the Beinecke essay, that there is no orpiment in the manuscript is important, because its source was in Italy. On the other hand, that pigment lost popularity in European works from about the 15thC to c.1625, after which its use again increased, continually, to the twentieth century – but not invariably, nor everywhere.

HIGHLY RECOMMENDED:

The talk proper begins at 4:50, but you might find the introduction interesting too because it describes Prof. Beeby’s qualifications. The end comment brings up the point of pigment-binders.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.