Professor Romaine Newbold, ‘The Roger Bacon Manuscript’, Transactions of the College of Physicians of Philadelphia, Series 3: Vol.43, (1921) pp. 431- 474. Section occurs pp.456ff.
Katherine Ellison and Susan Kim,(eds), A Material History of Medieval and Early Modern Ciphers: Cryptography and the History of Literacy, (2018).
[pdf] Mary d’Imperio, The Voynich Manuscript: an elegant Enigma, NSA. (original file)
[pdf] ibid. A cleaned-up copy which was later made available.
The Classical Astrologer blog. Also contains sources for information about classical, medieval and comparative astronomy. Note – some translations from the Arabic (e.g. names for Ibn Arabi’s lunar mansions) have alternative names or alternative translations.
Robert Singerman, Jewish Translation History: A Bibliography of Bibliographies and Studies (2012)
Philip Neal’s site. Transcription, translation and commentary on the seventeenth-century documents plus bibliographies and more. I suggest you bookmark it – though, for the record, I’m not endorsing Neal’s position on the manuscript’s origins, character or provenance. Addresss is philipneal.net
The Code Book: the science of secrecy from ancient Egypt to quantum cryptography – a freshman’s guide by Simon Singh (University of Califonia, Los Angeles). Downloadable pdf.
Information on recent codicological and palaeographic research see:
Vladimir Dulov’s blog (in Russian). A fresh scholarly voice providing acute observations and solid sources. Not ‘hypotheticals’ or quasi-historical narratives. Highly recommended.
Lisa Fagin Davis, working with the Shoenberg Institute for Manuscript Studies. Involvement of the Shoenberg Institute, with its experts in comparative codicology has been at the very top of my personal Voynich ‘wish list’ for some years now, ever since I realised that the content – not the manufacture – speaks to regions, ideas and peoples outside Latin Christian Europe. I’m sure the manuscript’s study will now move forward rapidly along the sort of careful, informed, conservative, non-hypothetical line that has been needed for so very long. Cheers all round! (All we need now is additional input from Beit Arie.
‘Medieval Pigments: Creation and Analysis – a convenient basic guide – a bibliography of online links. From University of Georgia, Franklin College of Arts and Sciences.
Codícología. A very good site for comparative codicology. In Spanish, but automatic Googletranslate does a fairly good job. You may get a notice in Spanish that you’ll must wait a few seconds for a page to adjust to your browser.
CONTENTS
Themes
§1.The Study’s Past in Review. (Posts 1 – 10):
An enciphered text?; the “Bacon ciphertext” idea; medieval Books of Secrets. The supposed ‘gunpowder cipher’. The Friedmans and Military cryptanalysts. Friedman meets the art historian Erwin Panofsky. Friedman presents his ‘Questions’ – Panofsky’s response in 1954.
§2.Specialist Opinions Re-examined. (Posts 11-17)
Panofsky’s privately-given opinion in 1932; Richard Salomon’s opinion on a line of marginalia; ‘Not One of Mine’– when specialists in medieval western European art, script and sciences were consulted – as they were before the 1960s, their conclusion was – unanimously – ‘not one of mine’.
Cultural and Psychological ‘Blocks’ affecting the Friedmans and d’Imperio’s Elegant Enigma.’ Posts 18 & 19.
Theory-driven approaches spread from cryptanalysis to all aspects of the study from the early 2000s. (Post 20)
§3.Expert Opinion versus Materials Science (Posts 20-27).
Voynich myths; the Beinecke Library’s website; Beinecke’s codicological description of the manuscript; R.S. Brumbaugh, H. O’Neill and others who, though qualified in one field, assumed themselves competent to pronounce on all aspects of the manuscript. examples of persons qualified in one area assuming competence in all. Beinecke Facsimile edition’s ‘Materials Science’ essay – marred by an editorialising hand; ‘Weed seeded’ fictions in Voynich studies; Gap between the theoretical and the investigative approaches illustrated.
§5. What Magic? Where Magic? (Posts 51-59) Investigating the roots of a ‘magic Voynich’ theory.
Not Wilfrid’s idea; not so much Newbold’s idea; not the Friedman’s idea. Just an idea floated late in the NSA’s involvement. Made much of in d’Imperio’s Elegant Enigma. Blind Spots.
§6. Following the manuscript’s lead (Posts 60-62)… from magic to codicology and astronomy.
§7. “Pharma-“? (Posts 63-73)Re-considering the manuscript’s “leaf-and-root” section.
Panofsky’s identification of the month-names as ‘regional French’ followed up by later researchers
1997 Dennis Stallings published a list of bibliographic and other items relating to Occitan in the first mailing list (10 Feb 1997) including the important note (later and independently stated by Artur Sixto (comment to ciphermysteries, February 17, 2011) ) that Occitan and Catalan – or Judeo-Catalan – are closely similar.
2009, Pelling credited Stolfi. In other posts, Pelling thought it most like the dialect of Toulouse. Pelling first, and others including Don Hoffman later, noted a closely similar orthography on astrolabe inscriptions dating to c.1400.
2011 Artur Sixto’s comment was made (February 17, 2011) at ciphermysteries.com, saying he thought the forms closer to Judeo-Catalan, and commenting on use of that dialect among emigrees into north-western France. Because so many comments were made to the same post by Pelling I quote here the whole of Sixto’s comment:
To me the months [names] seem to correspond slightly better to Catalan than Occitan. June for instance, spelled with “ou” corresponds to Catalan pronunciation, in French writing. “ny” would be Catalan relative to Occitan “nh” or French/Italian “gn”. So the person might have ties with the North of Catalonia (and could have a French influence) …. Interestingly, many Jews in Catalonia spoke Catalanic, a Catalan dialect close to Shuadit, i.e. Judaeo-Provençal (i.e. Judaeo-Occitan).
2015 Commenting at Stephen Bax’s blog (May 18, 2015 – 11:14 pm) ‘Don of Tallahassee’ [Don Hoffman] noted similar forms for month-names used in Picardy, his examples taken from calendars in fifteenth-century Books of Hours.
Panofsky quotes Richard Salomon’s interpretation of somemarginalia … “de Mussteil”- followed up by later writers such as Koen Gheuens – see blogpost ‘Der Musdel: Law in the Margins‘. and also see d’Imperio).
Feynman: “It doesn’t make a difference how beautiful the guess is. It doesn’t make a difference how smart you are, who made the guess, or what his name is… If it disagrees with experiment, it’s wrong. That’s all there is to it.”
The Month-folios, with ‘March’ (f. 70v-1) as paradigm.
This series contained original research by the present author. I’ve now (19/11/22) closed off most of it and removed the title-links to those posts. The few which are still available are linked below with their abstracts. leaving a few (linked) plus abstracts and some readings.
Post 28: Skies above [Pt.1] – background and methodological legacy. (August 17th., 2019)
Post 29: ————mSkies above – Pt.2.‘asteriskos’ Codicological details and the ‘asteriskos’ motif. (August 18th., 2019)
Putting some widely-held ideas to the test on the principle that
“It doesn’t make a difference how beautiful your guess is. It doesn’t make a difference how smart you are, who made the guess, or what his name is… If it disagrees with experiment, it’s wrong. That’s all there is to it.” – Richard Feynmann on scientific method.
Another interruption – sorry. Apr 16, 2022. Interaction of literal and mnemonic elements in folio 22r. Identification of plant-group as those termed ‘Myrobalans’ in medieval works.
THEME 9: Iconographic analysis in practice – two diagrams. (from f.85r and on folio 67v-1.